Today, the same jury that will decide whether the baker’s cake was unconstitutional will also decide if the court should award the cake a second trial.
The baker sued the county and the state of Kentucky over its refusal to allow him to sell his cake in its courthouses.
As a result, the baker, Chris White, now runs a website that sells cakes and other baked goods.
But the baker has also been sued by other people who claim they were denied a fair shake of his cakes.
“The county refused to grant my request for a fair trial and I am now seeking a jury trial to determine whether the cake by cake decision was a violation of the right to a fair and open trial,” White wrote in a court filing.
“As such, I am seeking a permanent injunction against the county.
The right to jury trial is a fundamental constitutional right, and the cake cake issue is a key aspect of the case.
According to White, his website is a “sketch of the cake” in which he describes the cake as “an expression of my religious beliefs” and that it’s “an invitation to celebrate Christmas and the season of life.”
The case is the latest in a long line of cases that have taken aim at what is now a legal and cultural norm.
In recent years, courts across the country have ruled that “cakes by the slice” and similar legal actions are protected under the First Amendment, though some cases have also found that people have a right to bake a cake themselves.
There is also some debate as to whether the right extends to baked goods in general.
One legal expert who studies the issue said he believes there is “some legal uncertainty” around whether the bakery has a right under the constitutional right to an open trial.”
The issue is whether this is a cake cake by the cake, a cake by a baker, or a cake that’s by a cake maker,” said the attorney who has handled hundreds of such cases in New York and other states.
Legal experts have also raised questions about whether cake bakeries are able to be sued over their religious beliefs, given the legal definition of religious expression.
This is not the first time that someone has sued a cake bakery.
A lawsuit filed in March 2017 by a transgender woman who said she was denied a cake to celebrate her birthday was dismissed in a Kentucky court, but the same court ruled in February that cake baker Michael James has the right, as a private citizen, to refuse service to people on the basis of their sexual orientation.
Cake bakeries have also been criticized for refusing to bake gay wedding cakes or for selling baked goods to gay couples, or for discriminating against them.
White said he has received numerous complaints about his cake business since he started the website and he has responded to all of them.
He said he’s “happy to answer any and all questions that people may have” about his business.
Last year, a California bakery owner, Mark Pazio, sued the city of Santa Ana, the county of Orange, and a group of other city officials for discriminating on the grounds of religion.
He claimed he was denied service on the day he ordered a cake for a same-sex wedding, because of his religion.
Pazio’s lawsuit was dismissed last year, but he’s been appealing the ruling.
Since then, he has been featured in a series of popular television shows about a baker in New Jersey who sells cakes for weddings.
Follow NBC Asian America on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Tumblr.